Dear Friends & Colleagues,
This last month, on the legislative front, The Ethics Commission continued to voice its opposition to CS/SB 7014, which prohibits local ethics commissions from self-initiating investigations into credible allegations of misconduct, including those referred by whistleblowers who fear retaliation for reporting on supervisors or elected officials. In correspondence sent out in March 2024, we urged the Governor’s General Counsel, Deputy Chief of Staff, and Chief Inspector General, to inform the Governor of how this legislation will not only prohibit ethics agencies from self-initiating investigations but will also hand-cuff law enforcement in its ability to refer possible violations of ethics ordinances or other breaches of public trust to ethics commissions for investigation. Simply put, absent a third-party sworn complaint based on personal knowledge the Ethics Commission will not be able to investigate misconduct even upon referral from law enforcement.
Regarding ethics opinions and guidance, at its March meeting, the Ethics Commission concluded its months-long consideration of a proposed formal opinion in response to a request for guidance from a local municipal elected official who operates a construction permitting support business in her city. At the meeting, the Commission heard a presentation from Miami-Dade County’s former chief building official, Charles Danger, and individual commissioners were able to question Mr. Danger. Thereafter, the Commission issued general guidance to the official. Special thanks to Mr. Danger for agreeing to attend, for serving as a subject matter expert on the construction permitting process, and on a pro bono basis.
Next week, I will be meeting with County budget officers to discuss the Ethics Commission’s fiscal year 24-25 budget. This may be a unique budgeting cycle for county departments and agencies, as this is the first budget year during which constitutional officers will be assuming the County’s police, elections, tax collector, and finance functions. As part of this process, the Ethics Commission is seeking to assume the employee and board financial filing and outside employment repository function that is currently the responsibility of the Elections Department but will not be once the Supervisor of Elections is elected in January 2025.
Finally, this last month, we said goodbye to Ethics Commissioner Lourdes Fernandez. Ms. Fernandez, an appointee from St. Thomas University’s law school, was a recent addition to the Ethics Commission but her thoughtful presence on the Commission and her graciousness in dealing with staff will be missed. Ms. Fernandez resigned her longtime position with St. Thomas to enter private practice and we wish her well.
The Ethics Commission will not be meeting in April because of a lack of quorum but look for us in May when the Ethics Commission will be considering an informal opinion issued to a county executive with a unique dual assignment that requires her to serve as the Executive Director of a private nonprofit organization. Also, the Commission will be electing a Chairperson and Vice Chairperson, as the terms for the current incumbents have expired.
As always, thank you for your continued support.
Regards,
Jose
|